Skip to main content
JCTR Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection
  • Login
  • Help Guide
  • Login
  • Help Guide
  • JCTR Site
  • Library Catalog
  • BNNB
  • Programmes
  • Partners
View Item 
  •   JCTR Repository Home
  • Governance
  • Policy and Legal Advocacy
  • Booklet
  • Advocacy on Socio-Economic Development
  • View Item
  •   JCTR Repository Home
  • Governance
  • Policy and Legal Advocacy
  • Booklet
  • Advocacy on Socio-Economic Development
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

JCTR Bulletin 4th Quarter 2010


Thumbnail
View/Open
Bulletin 86, 4th Q 2010.pdf (375.4Kb)
Date
2010
Author
Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection
Type
Bulletin
Language
en
Item Usage Stats
23
views
19
downloads
Abstract
The fourth quarter in Zambia, since 2009, is occupied with discussions of the National Budget and how Government is going to implement its programmes in the coming year. It is worth noting that before then Budget discussions used to take place in the first quarter of the fiscal year. It was interesting that both in the Budget Speech by the Minister of Finance and National Planning and the debates in Parliament, several references were made to developing Zambia, ensuring increased economic growth, and eradicating poverty. These are responses to development problems that Zambia and other least developed countries are facing. The problems that most developing countries are facing are solvable. The fact that these problems are complex and sometimes chaotic does not mean we can do nothing about them. Problems of bad governance, poverty, disease (malaria, AIDS, cancer, TB, STIs), donor dependency, rural underdevelopment, electoral malpractices, non-participation, disasters, and wars and tribal conflicts are all things that we can do something about. The unique problem in most developing countries is that people in these countries often fail to see that they are the solutions to their own problems. Instead, they want to believe that they are impotent, helpless, and that others, often the rich, Western countries and NGOs, can solve their problems. They would go further to assert that it is the moral obligation of the rich to solve the poor’s problems and suffering. The problem with this is that this dependence on others solving the poor’s problems is that, no matter how hard the others try, they cannot fully understand the problems of the poor and they often have to depend on development theories (often developed in the West), cause-effect assumptions, and knowledge learnt from people in developing countries. Depending on others has led to some “popular” ways and methods of solving problems that do not work. These have included use of development aid, Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs), use of capacity building workshops, a concentration on meetings and conferences, and pilot projects that do not graduate and are not universally applied. Most responses to development problems are either imposed or a process of buying in where even consultation is not honestly done. The rigidity of development practitioners – state or non-state – that is exhibited in fine-tuning their approaches, is a great hindrance to development and social change.
Subject
Democracy; Domestic Workers
Publisher
Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection
URI
https://repository.jctr.org.zm/handle/20.500.14274/30
Collections
  • Advocacy on Socio-Economic Development [1]
Metadata
Show full item record

Languages

Browse

All of JCTR RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
JESUIT CENTRE FOR THEOLOGICAL REFLECTION | Physical Address: 3813 Martin Mwamba Road, Olympia Park | Postal Address: P.O Box 37774, 10101 Lusaka, Zambia